Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia in children: a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) is an uncommon form of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Treatment of this arrhythmia has been considered difficult because of a high medication failure rate and risk of cardiomyopathy. Outcomes in the current era of interventional treatment with catheter ablation have not been published. OBJECTIVE: To describe the presentation and clinical course of PJRT in children. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 194 pediatric patients with PJRT managed at 11 institutions between January 2000 and December 2010. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 3.2 months, including 110 infants (57%; aged <1 year). PJRT was incessant in 47%. The ratio of RP interval to cycle length was higher with incessant than with nonincessant tachycardia. Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy was observed in 18%. Antiarrhythmic medications were used for initial management in 76%, while catheter ablation was used initially in only 10%. Medications achieved complete resolution in 23% with clinical benefit in an additional 47%. Overall, 140 patients underwent 175 catheter ablation procedures with a success rate of 90%. There were complications in 9% with no major complications reported. Patients were followed for a median of 45.1 months. Regardless of treatment modality, normal sinus rhythm was present in 90% at last follow-up. Spontaneous resolution occurred in 12% of the patients. CONCLUSION: PJRT in children is frequently incessant at the time of diagnosis and may be associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Antiarrhythmic medications result in complete control in few patients. Catheter ablation is effective, and serious complications are rare.

Permanent epicardial pacing in children: long-term results and factors modifying outcome.

AIMS: To evaluate the results of permanent epicardial pacing in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: All consecutive patients from one country (n = 119, period 1977-2009) undergoing permanent epicardial pacemaker implantation at <18 years of age (median 1.8 years, inter-quartile range 0.3-6.4 years) were studied retrospectively. Median patient follow up was 6.4 years (inter-quartile range 2.9-11.1 years); 207 generators, 89 atrial and 153 ventricular pacing leads were implanted. The probability of absence of any pacing system dysfunction was 70.1 and 47.2% at 5 and 10 years after implantation, respectively. Overall probability of continued epicardial pacing was 92.8 and 76.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and increased in the recent implantation era (post-2000, P = 0.04). The use of steroid-eluting leads decreased the risk of exit block with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.44, P < 0.001)]. The use of bipolar Medtronic 4968 leads reduced the risk of surgical reintervention because of fracture, insulation break, outgrowth or exit block in comparison to the unipolar 4965 lead design (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.40, P < 0.001). The AutoCapture™ feature (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.36, P < 0.001) and steroid-eluting leads (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.84, P = 0.021) decreased the risk of battery depletion. CONCLUSION: The probability of continued epicardial pacing in children was 76% at 10 years after implantation, increased for implantation in recent years, and allowed transvenous pacing to be deferred to a significantly greater age. The use of bipolar steroid-eluting leads and of a beat-to-beat capture tracking feature significantly increased pacing system longevity and decreased the need for surgical reinterventions.

Impact of the permanent ventricular pacing site on left ventricular function in children: a retrospective multicentre survey.

BACKGROUND: Chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with deleterious effects on cardiac function. OBJECTIVE: In an observational multicentre study in children with isolated atrioventricular (AV) block receiving chronic ventricular pacing, the importance of the ventricular pacing site on left ventricular (LV) function was investigated. METHODS: Demographics, maternal autoantibody status and echocardiographic measurements on LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and volumes at age <18 years were retrospectively collected from patients undergoing chronic ventricular pacing (>1 year) for isolated AV block. LV fractional shortening (LVFS) and, if possible LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated. Linear regression analyses were adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: From 27 centres, 297 children were included, in whom pacing was applied at the RV epicardium (RVepi, n = 147), RV endocardium (RVendo, n = 113) or LV epicardium (LVepi, n = 37). LVFS was significantly affected by pacing site (p = 0.001), and not by maternal autoantibody status (p = 0.266). LVFS in LVepi (39 ± 5%) was significantly higher than in RVendo (33 ± 7%, p < 0.001) and RVepi (35 ± 8%, p = 0.001; no significant difference between RV-paced groups, p = 0.275). Subnormal LVFS (LVFS < 28%) was seen in 16/113 (14%) RVendo-paced and 21/147 (14%) RVepi-paced children, while LVFS was normal (LVFS ≥ 28%) in all LVepi-paced children (p = 0.049). These results are supported by the findings for LVEF (n = 122): LVEF was <50% in 17/69 (25%) RVendo- and in 10/35 (29%) RVepi-paced patients, while LVEF was ≥ 50% in 17/18 (94%) LVepi-paced patients. CONCLUSION: In children with isolated AV block, permanent ventricular pacing site is an important determinant of LV function, with LVFS being significantly higher with LV pacing than with RV pacing.

Differential effects of the site of permanent epicardial pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in the young: implications for lead placement.

AIMS: To analyse left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function with respect to the epicardial pacing site in the young. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular function and synchrony (M-mode, speckle tracking) were evaluated during mid-term follow-up in 32 children with complete non-surgical (n = 15) or surgical (n = 17) atrioventricular block (structural heart disease in 21/32) paced from LV apex (n = 19), right ventricular (RV) apex (n = 7), and RV free wall (n = 6), respectively. Data are in the following order: LV apical, RV apical, and RV free wall pacing. Septal to posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD) = median 0, 69, and 136 ms (P < 0.001), septal to lateral mechanical delay = 54 +/- 29, 73 +/- 24, and 129 +/- 70 ms (P = 0.001), apical to basal mechanical delay = 96 +/- 37, 106 +/- 50, and 79 +/- 18 ms (P NS), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) = 57 +/- 9, 49 +/- 12, and 33 +/- 10% (P < 0.001), respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction correlated negatively with SPWMD (R(2) = 0.454, P < 0.001) and septal to lateral mechanical delay (R(2) = 0.320, P < 0.001) but not with apical to basal mechanical delay. Right ventricular free wall pacing (P = 0.014) and SPWMD (P = 0.044) were negative multivariable predictors of LVEF. CONCLUSION: Compared with other sites, LV apical pacing preserves septal to lateral LV synchrony and systolic function and may be the preferred epicardial pacing site in the young.